Print the page
Increase font size
Rocket Science Riches 101

Rocket Science Riches 101

Chris Campbell

Posted June 05, 2025

Chris Campbell

It couldn’t be real. Had to be a deepfake. A render. A mock-up. A prop from a sci-fi movie set.

An early April Fool’s joke.

The first time rocket scientists saw SpaceX’s new rocket engine—Raptor 3—many thought it was too good to be true.

Respected rocket engineer Tory Bruno, CEO of United Launch Alliance, said it had to be unfinished.

Why? Because it didn’t look like any rocket engine he’d ever seen.

Raptor 1

No tangled pipes. No exposed wires. No bulky external valves or dangling hardware.

Just a sleek, sculpted piece of metal that looked more museum sculpture than a machine designed to survive hellfire.

See, rocket engines are supposed to look complicated.

Ugly, even.

They're covered in “stuff”—redundant systems, clunky shielding, visible welds.

Take, for example, the Raptor 1.

Nobody suspected it was partial. Why? Because it looked like a bowl of pasta after a food fight. Cables everywhere. Pipes like a ball of snakes.

Just like it was supposed to.

Raptor 2

Raptor 2 was a little less messy, but it still looked like a rocket. Haphazard, chaotic, terrifying. Like it could blow up at any moment.

Raptor 3 is like going from film cameras to iPhones. And that’s only one reason it’s revolutionary.

Raptor 3

So what’s really going on under the hood?

Let’s compare.

And see how it represents one of the biggest investment opportunities on Earth—and off it.

1,800 Toyota Tacomas

Raptor 1 kicked things off with 408,000 pounds of thrust—enough to launch the weight of a Boeing 747 straight into the sky.

Inside the engine, each square inch (of the 500-square-inch chamber) held the weight of a midsize pickup (3,625 psi) —adding up to the pressure equivalent of 500 trucks pressing from within.

Raptor 2 turned up the volume and trimmed the fat: 507,000 pounds of thrust, 1,000 pounds lighter, and 4,350 psi. It even beat out the legendary Russian RD-180 and looked way more flight-ready.

Then came Raptor 3.

617,000 pounds of thrust. Just 3,300 pounds in weight. And 5,100 psi of chamber pressure. All while being simpler. Cheaper. Sleeker.

Not just better. Absurdly better.

In under a decade, SpaceX turned a backyard-looking science experiment into the most advanced rocket engine on Earth.

And even with all that power, it still takes 33 Raptors to lift a full Starship stack—about 11 million pounds of steel and fuel. That’s 1,800 Toyota Tacomas. Ten Statues of Liberty. A small aircraft carrier.

And the wildest part?

It works.

Why This Matters (and Why You Should Pay Attention)

Put simply…

If Starship works as intended—and Raptor is what makes it work—then SpaceX becomes not just a rocket company. It becomes FedEx for planets. Amazon for the asteroid belt. Uber, but for the galaxy.

The ultimate goal is infrastructure—a scalable, reusable transport system for Earth, the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

And none of this is hyperbole. That’s the literal business plan.

Yes, SpaceX is still private. You can’t just buy it on Robinhood.

But... we found a way in.

It’s our backdoor. Our rocket-ride before the IPO.

Because when the mainstream finally catches up—when Starship starts flying regularly and people realize what it means—it won’t be a whisper anymore.

It’ll be a scream.

And if you want in too, now’s the time.

Before the fire spreads.

If This Doesn't Work, I'm Screwed

Posted July 10, 2026

By James Altucher

I'm going to get glaucoma. Statistically, it’s almost guaranteed. Here’s my only hope.

The $9.1 Trillion Blackout

Posted July 09, 2026

By Chris Campbell

Even Lloyd's of London—the house that insures the unthinkable—flinched at the number: $9.1 trillion.

Space Blues: The Fed's Forgotten Warning

Posted July 08, 2026

By Chris Campbell

The prettier the sky, the harder everyone's looking the wrong way.

The AI Boom's Come-to-Jesus Moment

Posted July 07, 2026

By Chris Campbell

The only question is whether you're watching the right screen when the tape and the story finally disagree.

The Grid Goes to Hell

Posted July 06, 2026

By Chris Campbell

It would be the fastest major buildout of clean, round-the-clock power the country has ever seen. But will it work?

I’m Long America

Posted July 03, 2026

By Ray Blanco

I'm long the kid in Midland… and the country he's building. I'm long America. Happy 250th, you magnificent country.