Print the page
Increase font size
Elon's Big $123 Billion Valuation Problem

Elon's Big $123 Billion Valuation Problem

Davis Wilson

Posted September 05, 2024

Davis Wilson

Not all profits are created equal.

What I mean is if both an AI company and a traditional auto manufacturer earn $1 million in profit, the AI company will likely be valued higher by investors.

That’s because the future growth of the AI company is likely higher than the auto manufacturer.

In other words, the AI company will trade at a higher “multiple.”

Here’s the price/earnings (PE) multiples of some AI and auto manufacturing stocks:

Click here to learn more

AI companies are valued at an average of 36x earnings whereas auto manufacturing stocks are valued at an average of 8x earnings.

If both an auto manufacturer and an AI company earn $1 million in profit, the auto manufacturer will be valued around $8 million while the AI company will be valued around $36 million.

This is “back of the napkin” valuation 101.

I bring this up because this morning, Tesla announced full self-driving would soon be available in Europe and China.

The stock shot up as high as 7% on the news.

Elon Musk has been very vocal recently about why he thinks Tesla’s stock shouldn’t trade like a traditional auto manufacturer.

From the valuation 101 lesson above you can probably understand why.

Tesla earned $15 billion in profit last year. If it were valued like a traditional automaker, Tesla’s valuation would be somewhere around $120 billion. ($15B multiplied by an 8x multiple)

That would be well below the company’s current $736 billion valuation.

So why is Tesla’s market cap approximately 15x the size of Ford and GM, and 3x the size of Toyota, despite Tesla selling just a fraction of the cars compared to these companies in 2023?

Click here to learn more

You guessed it. Investors are expecting big innovations out of Tesla in the AI, autonomous driving, and robotics departments. 

So, much to Elon’s delight, the company trades more in line with companies like Nvidia and Uber versus traditional auto manufacturers like Ford, GM, and Toyota.

Click here to learn more

This morning, when Tesla announced full self-driving would soon be available in Europe and China, investors were reminded of the company’s impressive technology and sent shares higher by 7%.

[Contrast this to a few weeks ago when Tesla delayed its planned robotaxi event. The stock immediately dropped 9% as investors repriced the stock to trade more in line with traditional automakers.]

You can see why Elon is so vocal about Tesla being more of an AI company versus a traditional automaker.

The man owns 20% of Tesla.

At Tesla’s current valuation his stake is worth $147 billion.

If Tesla traded at 8x earnings, like traditional auto manufacturers, that stake would plummet to $24 billion - a $123 billion difference!

Thankfully, news stories like the one earlier today help his cause.

To find out whether the stock can continue to trade this high, all eyes are on the company’s robotaxi event on October 10th.

As always, we’ll bring you the coverage straight to your inbox.

The Ferrari Fallacy

Posted October 17, 2025

By James Altucher

Wealth is having something that recessions, layoffs, and algorithms can’t touch.

Crypto’s Monkey Paw Market

Posted October 16, 2025

By Chris Campbell

Seven things you need to survive crypto’s Monkey Paw market.

The Poor Man’s Crypto (SILVER 2.0)

Posted October 15, 2025

By Chris Campbell

Gold stablecoins are making gold sexier. A silver one could make the moon metal volatile, viral, and very, very fun to watch.

Rise of the Robot Belt

Posted October 14, 2025

By Chris Campbell

Crypto. AI. Robots. Biotech. Energy. Defense. Materials. America 2.0—all orbit the same core.

Bitcoin vs. Gold: Rematch of the Decade

Posted October 13, 2025

By Chris Campbell

Two philosophies laid bare: one rooted in math and networks, the other in metal and memory.

Day Two: Made Here, Again… Finally

Posted October 10, 2025

By Chris Campbell

There’s a new “Traitorous Eight” walking away from the four-decade orthodoxy of globalization. (Huge.)